•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Purpose: Complementary and integrative health (CIH) is common among patients in the U.S. and is a useful tool for athletic trainers to provide holistic treatment. There is currently minimal literature regarding athletic trainers’ experiences and outcomes of using CIH modalities for patient treatments. The purpose of this project was to explore the experiences and outcomes of collegiate athletic trainers using CIH modalities. Methods: This study used qualitative semi-structured interviews, analyzed by phenomenological approach, using consensual qualitative research analysis. Trustworthiness and credibility of the consensus codebook were established by member checking, multi-analyst triangulation, and auditing. Fourteen athletic trainers (7 females, 7 males, age=38±12 years, years of experience=15±12 years) engaged in an online interview (Zoom, San Jose, CA). All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Results: Four domains (Figure 1) emerged regarding the experiences and outcomes of CIH use by athletic trainers: 1) education, 2) motives, 3) clinical application, and 4) barriers. Participants had divergent educational pathways; self-directed learning was the most common pathway. Motives for using CIH interventions included improved subjective outcomes and patient preference. Participants discussed a variety of modalities and outcomes to assess their implementation. Barriers included stakeholder buy-in and resources. Conclusions: Participants noted improved outcomes via addressing the whole patient when using CIH. As athletic trainers interact with diverse patient populations, CIH interventions may provide more opportunities to include holistic care. However, education on CIH varies between participants. Education surrounding interventions in athletic training, regardless of the level of learning, should focus on quantifiable and meaningful clinical and patient-rated outcomes, which should include CIH approaches. Moreover, additional objective research regarding the outcomes of using CIH as a treatment modality is needed among athletic populations to increase stakeholder buy-in.

Author Bio(s)

Katherine Cantlebary DAT, LAT, ATC is a graduate of the Indiana State University Doctorate in Athletic Training program.

Matthew J Rivera, DAT, LAT, ATC is an assistant professor in the Indiana State University Doctorate in Athletic Training program in the department of Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Shannon Hamilton DAT, LAT, ATC is a graduate of the Indiana State University Doctorate in Athletic Training program and head athletic trainer at Saint Mary of the Woods College in Terre Haute, IN.

Lindsey E Eberman PhD, LAT, ATC is a professor an the program director of the Indiana State University Doctorate in Athletic Training program in the department of Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation.

DOI

10.46743/1540-580X/2023.2389

Share

 
COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.