When faced with a medical dilemma, the right decision depends on how the relevant ethical principles are prioritized. Prioritization of ethical principles in a medical dilemma often depends on contextual features, such as the patient’s age, economic impact, and public safety. Firearms should be as much a part of medical research and patient education as alcohol and tobacco, seat belts and car seats, safe sex and condoms. The problem with firearm research and patient education is twofold: a). government funded research on gun violence is currently prohibited by Congress1 and b). states and wellness programs actually prohibit doctors and other health professionals from asking about guns or entering information about gun ownership into a patient’s chart.2 Medical research and patient education on gun safety is vital to the practice of emergency and preventative medicine. Research will produce data and information that can be shared with health professionals at conferences and workshops. This information can be translated into medical consultation and education, patient brochures and handouts that health professionals can share discretely along with advice on safe sex, seat belts, car seats, baby staircase gates and banister guards, and the safe storage of cleaning solutions.

Author Bio(s)

Peter G. Holub, DPM, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Health Sciences in the College of Health Care Sciences at Nova Southeastern University in Ft. Lauderdale, FL.


Submission Location


To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.