•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Purpose: Athletic trainer (AT) turnover intention remains a challenge to the profession. Generational conflicts have emerged in employment culture across professions and may impact AT retention. This study aims to examine the impact of generational differences on measures that have been linked to the vitality of the profession. Methods: An online (Qualtrics, Provo, UT) cross-sectional survey was sent to 5,937 ATs through the NATA (5.8% response rate). Most participants identified as Millennial (227, 69.4%), European American (280, 85.6%) women (208, 63.6%) working in the secondary setting (136, 41.6%). The survey consisted of demographic questions, the Turnover Intention Scale-6 (TIS-6), Professional Identity and Values Scale-Athletic Training (PIVS-AT), and Professional Commitment Scale. We used a one-way ANOVA to compare professional identity (PI) between generations. Kruskal-Wallis analyses were used to compare turnover intention (TI) and professional commitment (PC) concerning generations. We used a multiple regression analysis to identify factors influencing professional commitment (p<.001). Results: Participants demonstrated expected levels of TI, PI, and PC. We identified significant differences between generations on PI (p<.001), PC (p<.001), and TI (p<.001). Specifically, Millennials and Baby Boomers (BOOM) (p<.001) and Generation Z (GenZ) and BOOM (p<.001) showed significant differences in PI. Turnover intention was significantly different between Millennials and BOOM (p<.001), and GenZ and Millennials (p=.03). Professional commitment was significantly different between Millennials and BOOM (p<.001), GenZ and BOOM (p=.03), and GenZ and GenX (p=.001). Collectively, generation, TI, and PI were significant and moderately predictive of PC (R2=0.417, b=3.73, p<.001); however, TI was the most powerful, inversely predictive factor of PC (r=-0.148, p<.001) while PI weakly correlated with PC (r=0.042, p<.001). Conclusions: Significant differences in professional identity, professional commitment, and turnover intention exist among athletic trainers of different generations. Generational differences should continue to be studied in athletic training to avoid generational conflict as this could potentially increase retention and the vitality of the profession.

Author Bio(s)

Kalynn M. Condrey, DAT, LAT, ATC, is a certified and licensed athletic trainer for Community Health Network in Greenwood, IN.

Lindsey E. Eberman, Ph.D, LAT, ATC is a Professor and Program Director for the Doctorate in Athletic Training Program at Indiana State University.

Kenneth E. Games, PhD, LAT, ATC, is the Director of Graduate Studies at Indiana State University in Terre Haute, IN. He is also a Professor in the Doctorate in Athletic Training program at Indiana State University.

Matthew J. Rivera, PhD, DAT, LAT, is an Associate Professor, Director of Clinical Education for the Doctorate in Athletic Training program, and Program Director of Applied Medicine at Indiana State University in Terre Haute, IN.

Share

 
COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.