•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Purpose: Health literacy plays a vital role in patients’ health and dictates their ability to locate, process, and understand basic health information to make informed decisions. Athletic trainers in the secondary school (SSATs) setting work with patients with varying health literacy levels. The purpose of this study was to explore SSATs' knowledge of health literacy and integration of best practice behaviors for patient education. Methods: A cross-sectional design, web-based survey including demographic, patient education practice behaviors, and health literacy knowledge assessment questions. Practice behavior questions identified techniques, strategies, and educational materials used during patient education. Health literacy knowledge assessment questions assessed health literacy knowledge of SSATs about patient education materials, reading levels, consequences and financial burden of low health literacy, and ways to enhance communication with patients with low health literacy. A Content Validity Index (CVI) assessed the demographic questions and practice behaviors questions (S-CVI/Ave = 0.94). A modified Delphi approach, including 3 athletic trainers with related expertise, was used to build consensus across 3 rounds of review on the knowledge assessment questions. Of the 13 original knowledge assessment questions proposed, only 10 had consensus for inclusion in the final instrument. Descriptive statistics were calculated using the measures of central tendency for demographics, practice behaviors, and the health literacy knowledge assessment. Results: Verbal communication, demonstration, and pictures were the most used patient education strategies. Just over half of the participants assessed the grade level of their own written patient education materials. Participants mostly learned about health literacy through continuing education or clinical/lived experience. The overall score for health literacy knowledge assessment was 1.5±1.1 out of 10 with a high score 4/10, indicating low knowledge on the assessment and impact of health literacy on patient care. The items correctly answered included understanding the average reading level of the U.S. population and best practices for reading level of patient education materials. Conclusion: SSATs scored particularly low on a consensus-validated health literacy knowledge assessment and reported few best practice patient education behaviors raising concerns for how well-prepared athletic trainers are for assessing health literacy and educating patients.

Author Bio(s)

Stephanie R. Toubman, MAT, LAT, ATC- Student in Doctorate in Athletic Training at Indiana State University

Justin Young, DAT, LAT, ATC- Ph.D Student in Education and Curriculum at Indiana State University

Lindsey E. Eberman, Ph.D, LAT, ATC- Professor and Program Director for the Doctorate in Athletic Training Program at Indiana State University

Matthew J. Rivera, Ph.D, DAT, LAT, ATC- Assistant Professor and Director of Clinical Education for the Doctorate in Athletic Training Program at Indiana State University

Share

 
COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.