Students’ Perceptions of Dissertation Preparedness: A Mixed Methods Case Study
Format Type
Plenary
Format Type
Workshop
Start Date
12-1-2021 1:30 PM
End Date
12-1-2021 1:50 PM
Abstract
Doctoral student attrition in onsite and online universities in the United States ranges from 40-80%. Student survey data have been collected but virtually no analyses have been conducted on students’ perceptions of their dissertation experience, defined as interactions with professors and other school supports. The purpose of this mixed methods case study is to identify factors contributing to doctoral student retention. Existing literature suggests the quality of student-faculty relationships may be the strongest predictor of student learning success. In this qualitative research supported by quantitative data, student evaluations of dissertation and research courses are analyzed to better understand how course content and faculty interaction contribute to students' dissertation preparedness in an online University in southwest United States. Study results could identify strategies to improve effectiveness of existing services/interventions and provide more specific direction on strengthening student/faculty relationships to positively influence student persistence, retention, completion, and graduation.
Keywords
online education, retention, doctoral programs
ORCID ID
0000-0003-0828-9884
Students’ Perceptions of Dissertation Preparedness: A Mixed Methods Case Study
Doctoral student attrition in onsite and online universities in the United States ranges from 40-80%. Student survey data have been collected but virtually no analyses have been conducted on students’ perceptions of their dissertation experience, defined as interactions with professors and other school supports. The purpose of this mixed methods case study is to identify factors contributing to doctoral student retention. Existing literature suggests the quality of student-faculty relationships may be the strongest predictor of student learning success. In this qualitative research supported by quantitative data, student evaluations of dissertation and research courses are analyzed to better understand how course content and faculty interaction contribute to students' dissertation preparedness in an online University in southwest United States. Study results could identify strategies to improve effectiveness of existing services/interventions and provide more specific direction on strengthening student/faculty relationships to positively influence student persistence, retention, completion, and graduation.
Comments
Aljohani, O. (2016). A comprehensive review of the major studies and theoretical models of student retention in higher education. Higher Education Studies, 6(2), 1–18.
Ames, C., Berman, R. R. B., & Casteel, A. . (2018). A preliminary examination of doctoral student retention factors in private online workspaces. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 79–107. https://doi.org/10.28945/3958
Andrews, K. (2016). Correlation between mentors and learners perceptions of mentors behaviors in completing online doctoral dissertations. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 16(2), 71–80.
Bean, J. P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12(2), 155-187.
Brill, J. L., Balcanoff, K. K., Land, D., Gogarty, M. & Turner, F. (2014). Best practices in doctoral retention: Mentoring.Higher Learning Research Communications, (2). https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v4i2.186
Devos, C. et al. (2017). Doctoral students' experiences leading to completion or attrition: A matter of sense, progress and distress. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(1), 61-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0290-0
King, Z. (2004). Career self-management: Its nature, causes and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 112-133.
Lee, H. K., Chang, H., & Bryan, L. (2020). Doctoral students’ learning success in online-based leadership programs: Intersection with technological and relational factors. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 21(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4462
Lee, J., Owens, M., & Lampley, J. (2016). Educational leadership and policy analysis support and encouragement study. Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 12(1), 41–47.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career Choice and Development, 4, 255-311.