Following the Middle East Peace Conference in Madrid in 1991, the Arms Control and Regional Security (ACRS) working group was launched as the first and so far only official regional arms control negotiations. While there have been multiple attempts to distil the lessons of the ACRS process, the aspect of events most conducive to forging trust between the negotiators and their inter-personal dynamics has never been explored. This paper takes an inter-disciplinary approach to studying negotiations: it zooms in on the ACRS process, integrating Middle East studies, decision making processes and nonproliferation literature with negotiations theory and oral history techniques, in the first attempt at a more comprehensive methodology to one of the highlights in the modern Middle Eastern diplomacy. To convey the multiple vantage points of participants, a three-stage methodological process is discussed: individual interviews with negotiating team members and facilitators, followed by group interviews of national delegations, and finally, a group session with representatives from each delegation. Ultimately, this model helps preserve a more accurate historical account, and significantly complements the technical insights on the negotiation dynamics with unexpected inter-personal relations angles, assisting in the design of more promising future frameworks.
Arms Control and Regional Security (ACRS) working group, conflict studies, cultural differences, diplomatic negotiations, inter-disciplinary approach, inter-personal dynamics, Middle East, negotiation behavior studies, oral history
"Studying Diplomatic Negotiations: Integrating the Personal and Institutional Aspects,"
Peace and Conflict Studies: Vol. 21:
2, Article 4.
Available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs/vol21/iss2/4