The international community is increasingly interested in promoting post-conflict reconciliation in a variety of forms, with trials and truth commissions featured most prominently. The contemporary academic discussion over transitional justice (and the practice of transitional justice itself) is largely focused on whether and how these types of large-scale national transitional justice mechanisms contribute to reconciliation. This article examines the promise and reality of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) to contribute to national reconciliation. Ultimately, the ability of state-wide policies to contribute to reconciliation rests on the active participation of local level actors. This requires political backing at the state and local level beyond that of just the international community. More attention needs to be paid to domestic cultural factors in the initial decision to implement state-wide transitional justice procedures, and bottom-up mechanisms must be built into any large scale approach to reconciliation.
civic organizations, Croatia, grassroots organizations, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, peace education, reconciliation
"The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: The Promise and Reality of Reconciliation in Croatia,"
Peace and Conflict Studies: Vol. 15:
2, Article 5.
Available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/pcs/vol15/iss2/5