Comparisions of Life Story Interviews between Young and Older Patients with Chronic Pain

Location

DeSantis Room 1049

Format Type

Plenary

Format Type

Paper

Start Date

17-1-2020 9:15 AM

End Date

17-1-2020 9:35 AM

Abstract

We wondered what’s different for older versus younger people with chronic pain. We interviewed 19 adults, ages 65 to 85, and 19 adults less than 35 years old with chronic pain, first by an older physician, and then, 2-4 weeks later, by a younger medical student, both using the semi-structured Northwestern University Life Story Interview. Data was analyzed in an iterative, comparative process using a constructivist, grounded theory approach as inspired by Charmaz. Common themes for all patients consisted of frustration with the medical system and their physicians for not helping them. Also shared was a belief that pain had mechanical causes and could be cured through mechanical means (especially surgery). Some unique categories emerged for the older patients, including surprise at their other medical co-morbidities, remorse and regret for things not done, surprise at being “old” when they didn’t feel “old,” anger at stigmatization for being old, and more self-evaluation and self-reflection. Comparing life stories by interviewer, we found that older patients consistently presented themselves more negatively and more dysfunctional to the older physician than to the younger medical student. They presented themselves as having more pride in their accomplishments and lives, having a sense they could transcend their suffering, and having found meaning and purpose in their suffering. In short, they were more heroic to the younger medical student and more angry, bitter, and dysfunctional to the older family physician. We confirm Bamburg’s observations that stories are always told for an audience and for a purpose.

Keywords

chronic pain, aging, life story, life story interview, meaning and purpose, self-reflection, interviewer influences

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Jan 17th, 9:15 AM Jan 17th, 9:35 AM

Comparisions of Life Story Interviews between Young and Older Patients with Chronic Pain

DeSantis Room 1049

We wondered what’s different for older versus younger people with chronic pain. We interviewed 19 adults, ages 65 to 85, and 19 adults less than 35 years old with chronic pain, first by an older physician, and then, 2-4 weeks later, by a younger medical student, both using the semi-structured Northwestern University Life Story Interview. Data was analyzed in an iterative, comparative process using a constructivist, grounded theory approach as inspired by Charmaz. Common themes for all patients consisted of frustration with the medical system and their physicians for not helping them. Also shared was a belief that pain had mechanical causes and could be cured through mechanical means (especially surgery). Some unique categories emerged for the older patients, including surprise at their other medical co-morbidities, remorse and regret for things not done, surprise at being “old” when they didn’t feel “old,” anger at stigmatization for being old, and more self-evaluation and self-reflection. Comparing life stories by interviewer, we found that older patients consistently presented themselves more negatively and more dysfunctional to the older physician than to the younger medical student. They presented themselves as having more pride in their accomplishments and lives, having a sense they could transcend their suffering, and having found meaning and purpose in their suffering. In short, they were more heroic to the younger medical student and more angry, bitter, and dysfunctional to the older family physician. We confirm Bamburg’s observations that stories are always told for an audience and for a purpose.