Validity in Qualitative Research: A Processual Approach

Location

DeSantis Room 1053

Format Type

Plenary

Format Type

Paper

Start Date

15-1-2020 9:45 AM

End Date

15-1-2020 10:05 AM

Abstract

Validity and reliability of research and its results are important elements to provide evidence of the quality of research in the organizational field. However, validity is better evidenced in quantitative studies than in qualitative research studies. As there is diversity within qualitative research methods and techniques, there is no universally accepted criteria to assess validity in qualitative studies; its usefulness is also questioned. Therefore, in this paper, we argue that qualitative research should adopt a processual view approach of validity since it should not be the product of a single test or just one step in the research. Processual validity both supports good research and helps in its reflection and guidance. To illustrate our approach, we present the processual approach adopted by one of the coauthors during the development of a research project. We highlight the validity assurance activities for both ex ante and ex post research, peer review and participation in an international conference, which corroborated the quality of the processual approach and the results that were obtained.

Keywords

Qualitative Research, Theory Building, Validity, Reliability, Processual Approach

Comments

The paper was submitted and published at The Qualitative Report (v.24, n.1, 2019) and the article was invited to participate in the conference.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Jan 15th, 9:45 AM Jan 15th, 10:05 AM

Validity in Qualitative Research: A Processual Approach

DeSantis Room 1053

Validity and reliability of research and its results are important elements to provide evidence of the quality of research in the organizational field. However, validity is better evidenced in quantitative studies than in qualitative research studies. As there is diversity within qualitative research methods and techniques, there is no universally accepted criteria to assess validity in qualitative studies; its usefulness is also questioned. Therefore, in this paper, we argue that qualitative research should adopt a processual view approach of validity since it should not be the product of a single test or just one step in the research. Processual validity both supports good research and helps in its reflection and guidance. To illustrate our approach, we present the processual approach adopted by one of the coauthors during the development of a research project. We highlight the validity assurance activities for both ex ante and ex post research, peer review and participation in an international conference, which corroborated the quality of the processual approach and the results that were obtained.