Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 31 > No. 10 (2026)
Abstract
This article stems from a desire to counter monologic, or single-voiced, approaches to data analysis and to consider opportunities for a dialogic approach that offers opportunities to engage and discover nuance and complexity in the research process. Drawing on our own research experiences, we offer a discussion of three methods of dialogic analysis: Reconstructive Horizon Analysis (RHA), participatory analysis, and Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR). Locating each of these within a kind of spectrum of dialogism, we illustrate how different forms of dialogic analysis can create space for complexity, nuance, perspective-taking, and in the best case, collaborative, intersubjective meaning making. We suggest that dialogic analysis offers opportunities to challenge or counter our own reading of a given research context, and that this opportunity can occur to different degrees.
Keywords
dialogue, Benjamin, Buber, Bakhtin, data analysis, intersubjectivity, collaboration
Publication Date
10-31-2026
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
Recommended APA Citation
Ross, K., & Call-Cummings, M. (2026). Intersubjectivity, collaboration, and the possibilities of dialogic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 31(10), 6841-6858.
ORCID ID
Karen Ross: 0000-0003-3952-5149; Meagan Call-Cummings: 0000-0002-9952-0449
