Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 31 > No. 1 (2026)
Abstract
This article addresses the methodological tension between description and interpretation in a phenomenological study on young women's political participation. The researchers explore how this tension influenced decisions about data collection and selection in applied hermeneutic phenomenology. A reflexive, meta-analytic approach is employed to examine research materials—epistemological diaries, team discussions, working documents, and researchers’ accounts—tracing how empirical material was produced and selected. Four distinct stages in the data collection process are identified and reveal how interpretative dilemmas emerged in the formulation of interview scripts, data gathering strategies, and narrative selection. The findings indicated that participants’ descriptions already contain a first level of interpretation, though not always consciously reflective. The discussion highlights the central role of reflexivity in navigating the tension between descriptive fidelity and interpretative depth. The article concludes that this tension is intrinsic to phenomenological inquiry, and that applied hermeneutic phenomenology provides conceptual and practical tools to address it constructively.
Keywords
meta reflection, reflexivity, phenomenology, hermeneutics
Publication Date
1-31-2026
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2026.7900
Recommended APA Citation
Folgueiras, P., De Ormaechea, V., & Matta, A. (2026). The role of reflexivity in collecting and selecting LEDs in a phenomenological study. The Qualitative Report, 31(1), 5056-5075. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2026.7900
ORCID ID
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0599-2868
ResearcherID
57934636000
Included in
Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Social Statistics Commons
