Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 29 > No. 3 (2024)
Abstract
This article explores the complexity and challenges of making decisions regarding which theories and social categories (e.g. race, class) should be emphasized in justice-centered research that includes participants’ identities as key variables in the design. Drawing on theories of intersectionality, agential realism, and complexity, the author proposes four intersectional design dimensions to help justice-centered researchers honor complexity: reflection on self and purpose; making agential cuts; complexifying social categories; and intersectional and collaborative re-view. Each dimension is illustrated with theory and empirical examples, mostly drawing from the field of educational research. By attending to and continually revisiting agential cuts related to social categories in conversation with community members, researchers can better represent layered, complex, and changing phenomena.
Keywords
complexity, identity, intersectionality, research design, social justice
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to colleagues who helped with this article, including Thomas Albright, Stephanie Behm Cross, Camea Davis, Chantee Earl, Sig/Sara Giordano, Noah Golden, Jacob Hackett, David Low, Christopher Martell, Rob Petrone, Sophia Tatiana Sarigianides, Amy Vetter, and Rhina Fernandes Williams.
Publication Date
3-8-2024
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6482
Recommended APA Citation
Behizadeh, N. (2024). Agential Cuts for Justice: Honoring Complexity in Research through Intersectional Design Dimensions. The Qualitative Report, 29(3), 782-792. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6482
ORCID ID
0000-0002-8009-8751