Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 25 > No. 8 (2020)
Abstract
The paper describes the application of a qualitative diary method combined with in-depth interviews in the context of headquarters-subsidiary cooperation. We examine the distinct requirements of studying shared understanding in the case of distributed teams and argue that further research is necessary in order to explain inter-team conflicts arising from incongruent understandings and divergent expectations. Building on this research gap, we perform a case study in the headquarters of a multinational technology company and one of its subsidiaries. With the help of Event Sampling Methodology (ESM) and in-depth interviews, we were able to identify, analyze and comprehend situations characterized by lacking shared understanding. By this, our research contributes to the methodical discussion on event sampling methods and proposes new fields of application. Furthermore, it contributes to the international management literature by analyzing misunderstandings in international R&D cooperation.
Keywords
Diary Methods, Event Sampling Methodology, International Management, Headquarters-Subsidiary Cooperation, Shared Understanding, Distributed Project Development
Acknowledgements
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the EURAM'18, Conference of the European Academy of Management, on 19-22 June 2018 in Reykjavík. The authors would like to thank all the participants and the managers of the company who made this study possible.
Publication Date
8-20-2020
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4507
Recommended APA Citation
Seus, F., & Weissenberger-Eibl, M. A. (2020). Using Event Diaries and In-Depth Interviews for Understanding Shared Understanding in Headquarters-Subsidiary Cooperation. The Qualitative Report, 25(8), 3085-3110. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4507
Included in
International Business Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons