Mixed methods research is increasingly valued, although little attention has been placed on how to execute such projects well to achieve optimal publication for impact. Multiple publications from a single study allow scholars to explicate findings that cannot be contained in a single article and which address different aspects of study findings. This article contributes to the fields of mixed methods research by building on their roots in pragmatism, which we argue calls for effective research studies resulting in published findings. This article proposes a project management framework and describes how to optimize mixed methods manuscript production during each of 5 research phases. We describe lessons learned from project management and implementation of our own mixed methods projects to help research teams build quality projects with optimal publication outputs and impact.
Research Design, Data Reporting, Mixed Methods, Qualitative Research, Publication Productivity
We appreciate suggestions and insight from Carla A. Green, Leslie Curry, Zahirah Alleyne-McNatt, and Neely Myers on previous versions of this manuscript. We appreciate suggestions from reviewers as well. This work was completed while A.B.-L. and J.P.W. were at the City University of New York and while A.J.O. was at Sam Houston State University and the University of Cambridge.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
Recommended APA Citation
Baim-Lance, A., Onwuegbuzie, A., & Wisdom, J. (2020). Project Management Principles for Optimizing Publication Productivity of Mixed Methods Studies. The Qualitative Report, 25(3), 646-661. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol25/iss3/6