Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 25 > No. 3 (2020)
Abstract
The number of Chinese postgraduates in JMC has steadily increased with the growing number of JCC master’s programs in in China. Little is known about key factors that influence Chinese students’ decisions in choosing which program attend. In order to fill a gap in the academic field, a qualitative phenomenological approach was applied to examine the experiences of seven Chinese master’s students in JMC from three different universities in Zhejiang province, China. Three important themes have been created including (1) geographical advantages; (2) recommendation of peers and professors; and (3) course design and curriculum. These findings have important implications for school officials and decision makers, with respect to allocating their resources wiser to make masters programs in JMC more attractive. In addition, this research study is the first analysis of its kind to apply a phenomenological approach to study experiences of Chinese students in making decisions of choosing a master’s program. This study lays a valuable foundation for similar topics through a qualitative research method.
Keywords
Phenomenology, Qualitative, Chinese Students, Master Programs, Decision-Making
Acknowledgements
I wish to acknowledge Dr. Honggang Yang for his encouragement and guidance. I also want to extend my gratitude to Dr. Robin Cooper and Dr. Jason Campbell. I am especially grateful to the participants for their contributions to and support of this research.
Publication Date
3-20-2020
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4013
Recommended APA Citation
Wang, Z., He, Z., & Fu, Z. (2020). What Factors Influence Chinese Students to Choose Master Program in JMC: A Phenomenological Study. The Qualitative Report, 25(3), 721-732. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4013
Included in
Accessibility Commons, Higher Education Administration Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons