Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 8 > No. 4 (2003)
Abstract
This paper uses focus group data about women’s work experiences gathered in five Canadian east coast communities to examine some of the strengths and weakness associated with focus group research. I explore the case made against the use of focus group methods and the basis for some of the critiques aimed at focus group research. By examining the evolving discussions between focus group members, it is possible to understand some of the benefits of group-talk, including the creation of a unique opportunity for interaction, joint meaning creation and contradiction.
Keywords
Focus Groups, Theory, Meaning Construction, Interaction, and Conflict
Acknowledgements
Thank you to the Board of the Women’s Health Network, Newfoundland, and Labrador along with the project advisory committee for their guidance and support. Dr. Joan Eakin reviewed an earlier version of this manuscript, and I am grateful for her thoughtful comments. This research was funded by the National Network on the Environments and Women’s Health and the Atlantic Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health.
Publication Date
12-1-2003
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1866
Recommended APA Citation
Kosny, A. (2003). Joint Stories and Layered Tales: Support, Contradiction and Me aning Construction in Focus Group Research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 539-548. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1866
Included in
Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Social Statistics Commons