Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 16 > No. 6 (2011)
Abstract
In Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis, Frederick J. Wertz, Kathy Charmaz, Linda M. McMullen, Ruthellen Josselson, and Rosemarie Anderson provide students and researchers with both a broad knowledge base and specific examples of each of their preferred methods of analysis. The authors apply their respective expertise of phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry to sixth author Emalinda McSpadden's narrative of responding to an unfortunate situation. The result is a comprehensive comparison of each method emphasizing unique strengths and weaknesses in each approach as well as the reflexivity required of researchers utilizing such analyses.
Keywords
Phenomenological Psychology, Grounded Theory, Discourse Analysis, Narrative Research, Intuitive Inquiry
Publication Date
11-1-2011
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1328
Recommended APA Citation
Root, C. (2011). Ophthalmology for the Myopic Methodologist: A Review of Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 16(6), 1753-1756. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1328
Included in
Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Social Statistics Commons