Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 9 > No. 2 (2004)
Provisions of Trustworthiness in Critical Narrative Research: Bridging Intersubjectivity and Fidelity
This paper is a reflective-reflexive examination of provisions of trustworthiness in critical narrative research. The author presents her understanding of provisions of trustworthiness as a science and as an art, and blurs these boundaries as she acknowledges their tension in practice. She weaves between theory and her experience in two studies first the study of the Texas-Spain Visiting Teachers Program and secondly the study of Amish culture and education where the author felt a deep sense of responsibility that she maintain trustworthiness. This paper examines the provisions of trustworthiness as evidence of research accountability and shared responsibility and brings to the forefront an intersubjective understanding of fidelity that emerged through understanding participants struggles, seeing researcher as a co-struggler for cultural-political identity, and recognizing the role of politics in the work of action research for democratic education. In short, the author presents an intersubjective understanding of fidelity issues within multiple identities.
Qualitative Methods, Health Risks, Causality, and Lay Etiologies
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
Recommended APA Citation
Moss, G. (2004). Provisions of Trustworthiness in Critical Narrative Research: Bridging Intersubjectivity and Fidelity. The Qualitative Report, 9(2), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2004.1933
Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Social Statistics Commons