Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 31 > No. 4 (2026)
Abstract
This article explores writing as a process of inquiry and meaning-making in the autoethnographic tradition, offering reflections on the recursive, emergent, and dialogical/dialectical nature of writing, along with some points for consideration. Drawing on perspectives from qualitative research and narrative inquiry (Riessman, 2008), I argue that autoethnographic writing serves as a method of inquiry and/or discovery, generating ontological, epistemological, and axiological-driven cultural meaning that functions as a site of reflection, interrogation, and re-storying of lived experiences. This recursive, often messy, and reflexive act allows researchers to excavate, analyze, and interpret their lived experiences. Rather than viewing writing as a final-stage product for reporting insights, this article explores how composing text can generate new questions, reveal hidden emotions, and create connections between the individual and the broader cultural context. Drawing on personal reflections from my own autoethnographic writing, I explore the transformative potential of writing as a form of inquiry. I provide space for reflection from my master's and Ph.D. inquiries on how the writing process, grounded in autoethnography, enhances the rigor of qualitative reports. I offer key points for autoethnographers who wish to engage more consciously and productively with writing as a core epistemological process, including strategies for embracing vulnerability; navigating narrative truth and addressing its threats, such as narcissism, solipsism, and aestheticism; and practicing rigorous reflexivity. I conclude that treating writing as inquiry allows autoethnographers to foreground uncertainty, complexity, and the transformative potential of meaning-making.
Keywords
autoethnography, writing as process of inquiry, meaning-making, reflexivity, qualitative research, narrative research, creative-analytic practices
Acknowledgements
This article describes the writing process as a form of inquiry for meaning-making in autoethnographic traditions that I have adopted in my research projects, dissertation, and thesis for my master's degree and Ph.D. Thus, I would like to take this opportunity to express my gratitude to my master's degree dissertation supervisor, Assoc. Prof. Binod Prasad Pant, Ph.D., and Ph.D. thesis supervisor, Prof. Bal Chandra Luitel, Ph.D. I am also grateful to everyone who contributed to improving the quality of my article. Likewise, I would like to thank the reviewers and editors of the TQR for their suggestions, comments, and guidance that helped elevate this article to the next level.
Publication Date
4-27-2026
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
Recommended APA Citation
Dahal, N. (2026). Writing as a process of inquiry in autoethnography for meaning-making: Reflections and some points for consideration. The Qualitative Report, 31(4), 5595-5615. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2026.7996
ORCID ID
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7646-1186
ResearcherID
AEK-2733-2022
Included in
Agency Commons, Archival Science Commons, Cognitive Science Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Methods Commons, Epistemology Commons, Philosophy of Mind Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, Scholarly Publishing Commons, Social Justice Commons, Social Statistics Commons
