Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 29 > No. 7 (2024)
Abstract
This article contributes to the literature by proposing an expanded “framework for credibility and approachability,” extending the framework’s applicability in conflict-affected societies. The credibility and approachability framework aids researchers in comprehending and evaluating their fieldwork experiences, enabling them to articulate their experiences clearly and insightfully. Drawing on the reflexive experiences of a diaspora-based researcher who used this framework to prepare for fieldwork in Nigeria, the article illustrates the framework’s components plus the added “bearability” component. The experiences were borne out of a study with 54 participants across focus groups in communities affected by eco-violence in the Nigerian Middle Belt. The researcher’s positionality of “betweenness” is also discussed, highlighting the complexities of conducting research as an academic “homecomer” in communities located in conflict-affected areas.
Keywords
fieldwork, credibility and approachability framework, bearability, eco-violence, insider/outsider
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Moses Ajaka, Elaigwu Noah Abel, Jumoh Audu, Gino Vlavonou, and all the community members who shared their lived experiences with him. This article would not have been possible without them. He extends his gratitude to the reviewers for their insightful recommendations and to Olariche and Nkeiru for their unwavering support.
Publication Date
7-16-2024
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6773
Recommended APA Citation
Olumba, E. E. (2024). Navigating Credibility and Approachability in Conflict Zones: Insights from Fieldwork in Nigerian Communities Facing Eco-Violence. The Qualitative Report, 29(7), 1876-1891. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6773
ORCID ID
0000-0001-5512-5992
Included in
Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Social Statistics Commons