Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 29 > No. 4 (2024)
Abstract
In popular management literature corporations are sometimes loosely compared to cults. The comparison is a severe allegation as it implies the transgression of subordinate employees’ integrity. This paper explores to what extent such comparisons with cults are warranted as well as the implications this has for the practice of corporate culture management. On grounds of the author’s unique, first-hand experience in both corporate and cultic environments a retrospective autoethnographic (RAE) approach was chosen to further explore the supposed resemblance. The comparison is structured along Lifton’s eight criteria of thought reform and reveals that although akin to cults in all aspects corporations also fundamentally differ due to the infeasibility, at least for now, of controlling the corporate environment in totalist fashion. This might explain why so many attempts to change corporate cultures fail as these initiatives are based on the anachronistic idea that culture change can be “implemented” by somehow “inculcating” employees with “company values.” A sanitized form of brainwashing that fails in the corporate environment.
Keywords
culture change, corporate cult, indoctrination, totalism, retrospective autoethnography
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Professor Svetlana Khapova for giving me the opportunity to explore off-beat ideas in unconventional ways. I am forever grateful to B.P. Puri Goswami for his protection and spiritual counsel free from sectarianism. I thank my lovely wife Renske for making me smile. Lastly, I thank my beautiful children, Anand and Marley, for being the way they are.
Publication Date
4-1-2024
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6398
Recommended APA Citation
Graamans, E. (2024). The Blurry Line Between Corporation and Cult: A Retrospective Autoethnographic Study. The Qualitative Report, 29(4), 880-897. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6398
ORCID ID
0000-0001-6781-5624
Included in
Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Other Anthropology Commons, Other Psychology Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons, Social Statistics Commons