Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 29 > No. 12 (2024)
Abstract
My starting point in this paper is the question of whether the interview, as a method to contribute knowledge, has become incommensurable and thus superfluous within post-qualitative research frameworks. I take seriously the critiques posited by scholars in the field of post-qualitative inquiry and seek to clarify the generative possibilities of aligning interviews with a post-structural paradigm. My incorporation of narrative practices into this exploration not only grounds the discussion in a narrative practice-based methodology but also offers readers practical ideas for addressing the challenges of paradigmatic congruency. This approach signals a methodological innovation, and I propose a practical process for scholars, researchers, and practitioners interested in reflecting on their interview practices and methodological responsibilities. In doing so, I hope this paper can serve as a resource for those seeking to navigate the intricate landscape of qualitative research methodologies, contributing to ongoing discussions and advancing the field with narrative-practice informed research practices.
Keywords
interviews, post-structuralism, narrative practices, methodological responsibility, post-qualitative inquiry
Publication Date
12-8-2024
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2024.7802
Recommended APA Citation
Strauven, S. (2024). Exploring the incommensurability of the interview in postqualitative research: A narrative practice-informed approach. The Qualitative Report, 29(12), 62-81. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.7802
Included in
Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Social Statistics Commons