Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 29 > No. 12 (2024)
Abstract
This paper explores how ableist assumptions can unintentionally create barriers to participation in research by those of non-normative bodies or minds. In traditional epistemology, bodies are considered “universal” rather than “specific,” and the universal body is coded as fully able-bodied and independent with brain and body adhering to normative standards of the White heterosexual English-speaking male. In this article, I present a story of “enabling participation” for those of diverse body capacity in my work with young women living with chronic illness.[1]Specifically, I explore the accommodations and adaptions I made to my research design to account for the non-normative form and function of my participants’ bodies and my own. Using the method of participant action research, the research participants became research co-collaborators as we collectively developed resources based on insider knowledge. Through sharing the story of my research, I invite other researchers to consider ways of enabling participation for a diverse array of bodies and minds in their own research.
[1] Throughout this article, “women” refers to cisgender women, trans women, and all the gender-expansive folk who are comfortable with this label.
Keywords
participant action research, narrative therapy and community work, feminist methodologies, lived experience, insider knowledge, ableism, chronic illness, ME/CFS, fibromyalgia
Publication Date
12-23-2024
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2024.7808
Recommended APA Citation
Hosking, G. (2024). Resisting ableism in research design. The Qualitative Report, 29(12), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.7808
Included in
Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Social Statistics Commons