Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 27 > No. 6 (2022)
Abstract
This study aims to find conceptual innovations, with a focus on the scope of University Social Responsibility in the perspective of transformative ecofeminism. The basic belief that guides action in this research is the transformative worldview. The research approach is based on feminism with the data collection process carried out by observation, in-depth interviews, documentation, and FGDs. The two data research rigour strategies chosen were to maintain the credibility (internal validity) and reliability of the research data through triangulation of techniques and sources and to carefully review the documentation of research procedures/protocols and databases. The presentation of data and the results of the study used a “spiral data analysis.” This process was carried out by data management, making memos, categorizing, and interpreting data to presenting the final research report. The sample is stated with ten key informants used as participants. The results of the study provide a framework for the scope of USR, which consists of eight dimensions in which there are 27 indicators that direct the university's actions in realizing its social responsibility. IPE (Integrity, Professionalism, Entrepreneurship) organizational culture becomes a reinforcing value in realizing the goals of each dimension.
Keywords
university social responsibility, entrepreneurship, feminist approach, transformative ecofeminism
Publication Date
6-22-2022
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5493
Recommended APA Citation
Widianingsih, L., Triyuwono, I., Djamhuri, A., & Rosidi, R. (2022). University Social Responsibility from the Transformative Ecofeminism Perspective. The Qualitative Report, 27(6), 1688-1709. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5493
ORCID ID
0000-0002-2777-6832
Included in
Accounting Commons, Finance and Financial Management Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons