Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 26 > No. 11 (2021)
Abstract
Little is known about the ethical experiences of psychologists who work with high-risk youth using a harm reduction approach. We used interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to explicitly explore this phenomenon. In this small exploratory study three participants were interviewed to glean their experiences of ethical tension. Data analysis revealed three superordinate themes (questioning, acting, and holding) within which eight subthemes are subsumed (questioning beneficence, questions from others, self-care, social change, negotiation, consultation and supervision, acceptance, and sitting with tension). The results of this research suggest that context-specific ethical tensions may arise for psychologists who work with high-risk youth using a harm reduction approach, which in turn lead to and necessitate a tailored ethical response. The results also suggest that harm reduction promoters may benefit from increased dialogue with licencing and professional bodies to foster awareness and develop guidelines on promoting ethical practice when using a harm reduction approach with high-risk youth. Future research can profitably be directed towards an increased experiential understanding of some of the central themes of this research, such as “sitting with tension” and “holding.”
Keywords
counselling, ethical tensions, harm reduction, high-risk youth, interpretative phenomenological analysis
Publication Date
11-1-2021
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5073
Recommended APA Citation
Owens, P. I., & Nuttgens, S. (2021). The Experiences of Ethical Tensions When Using Harm Reduction with High-Risk Youth. The Qualitative Report, 26(11), 3342-3361. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5073
ORCID ID
0000-0001-6112-7863
Included in
Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Counseling Psychology Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Social Statistics Commons, Theory and Philosophy Commons