This paper sheds light on the methodological dilemma in microfinance research and examines the feasibility of conducting a qualitative case study. Microfinance research is dominated by quantitative impact studies. However, the issues of process and implementation are critical to make an impact. The paper argues that a qualitative case study method can be used as a supplement or an alternative to quantitative methodology, because it is context-specific and naturally enquires research problem. The in-depth and in-detail inquiry make the findings more robust, and readers can understand the meaning holistically by reading stories and quotes. The case study can be used to prove microfinance impacts and to improve microfinance practices.
Qualitative, Case Study, Microfinance, Methodology
I am indebted to all the reviewers and the editors of the Qualitative Report for their valuable comments and suggestions in developing the manuscript. I am indebted to Mizanur Rahman, Associate Professor, Department of English, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh for his valuable contribution in editing the manuscript.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.
Recommended APA Citation
Chowdhury, S., Ahmmed, F., & Hossain, M. (2020). Methodological Dilemma in Microfinance Research: Applicability of a Qualitative Case Study Design. The Qualitative Report, 25(2), 271-290. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol25/iss2/1