In this article, we trace interactions with participants in two different research projects. Although the research settings were different, we focus on what the projects had in common: a commitment to collaboration, methodological training from the same faculty, and our respective decisions to turn away from labeling our work collaborative deep into each project’s development. In a narrative as chronicle, we represent ways each project unfolded and then why each of us abandoned claims of collaboration. Specifically, we share the critical positions we staked early in our research designs and the communication with participants that taught us to un-name what had been a priori hopes for collaboration. Subsequently, we represent the effects that un-naming collaboration generated. Using in vivo coding (Saldaña, 2013) to search for explanations of participation, we found that participants wanted to help us. We discuss the theme: “Sharing to Help” and three subthemes. We found participants helped, because (1) a “story told” might “benefit” someone else; (2) participants wanted to challenge stereotypes about people of Color, people in prison, and people in transitional housing; and (3) participants believed in our “concern” and “care” about what it was we were trying to understand.
Participants, Collaboration, Naming Research Design, Ethnography
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
Recommended APA Citation
Anders, A., & Diem, J. (2018). Un-Naming Collaboration: An Unexpected Catalyst for Understanding Participation in Critical Ethnography. The Qualitative Report, 23(10), 2294-2312. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3425
Community-Based Research Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Educational Sociology Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Social Work Commons