Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 15 > No. 3 (2010)
In this paper, various methodological issues surrounding the sociological study of sport are explored. Through an imagined dialogue between two graduate students at a hockey game, this work brings together three divergent approaches to social enquiry: Positivist Grounded Theory, Constructivist Grounded Theory, and Actor-Network Theory. This paper challenges conventional writing on method in two ways: (a) assembling three divergent approaches within a single work, and (b) employing a scripted narrative as a means of exploring methodological issues. Through this innovative approach, many of the overlaps and tensions between these theories/methods are captured. In so doing, numerous methodological questions about the sociological study of sport, as well social science research more generally are raised.
Grounded Theory, Actor-Network Theory, Sport, Constructivism, and Qualitative Research
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
Recommended APA Citation
Fogel, C. (2010). A Hockey Night in Canada: An Imagined Conversation between Theorists. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 658-674. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1169
Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Social Statistics Commons