In this paper we argue that for the secondary analysis of qualitative data to be effective, researchers need to subject any accompanying interviewer notes to the secondary analysis process. The secondary analysis of interviewer notes can provide important insight into the research process and the attitudes, experiences, and expectations of those collecting the data. Such information is essential if meaningful analyses are to be offered. Using interviewer notes from a little known research project on youth transitions form the 1960s, this paper explores how the interviewers’ experiences of the research process and their perceptions are documented in the interviewer notes.
Interviewer Notes, Secondary Analysis, Qualitative Data, Research Process, Interviews, Recording Data, Representations of Respondents, and Sources of Bias
This paper is part of an ESRC project, From Young Workers to Older Workers: Reflections on Work in the Life Course (R000223653). We would like to thank Ronald Chenail and the reviewers for their useful comments.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
Recommended APA Citation
Goodwin, J., & O'Connor, H. (2006). Contextualising the Research Process: Using Interviewer Notes in the Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data. The Qualitative Report, 11(2), 374-392. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2006.1679