Home > CAHSS > CAHSS Journals > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 10 > No. 4 (2005)
Abstract
We are thesis examiners within the Australian academic system who formed a “community of practice” to try to resolve some of the issues we were facing. Stories of examiners reflecting on and examining their own practice are a notable silence in the higher degree research literature. In this study we have adopted a storytelling inquiry method that involved telling our practitioner stories, firstly to each other and then to a wider audience through this paper. We then identified issues that we believe are relevant to other thesis examiners. We have also found that engaging in a “community of practice” is itself a valuable form of examiner professional development
Keywords
Thesis Examiner Training, Storytelling, and Practitioner Research
Publication Date
12-1-2005
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.
Recommended APA Citation
Sankaran, S., Swepson, P., & Hill, G. (2005). Do Research Thesis Examiners Need Training?: Practitioner Stories . The Qualitative Report, 10(4), 817-835. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol10/iss4/10
Included in
Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons, Social Statistics Commons
