Home > HCAS > HCAS_PUBS > HCAS_JOURNALS > TQR Home > TQR > Vol. 28 > No. 9 (2023)
Abstract
Theory development is an important component of academic research since it can lead to the acquisition of new knowledge, the development of a field of study, and the formation of theoretical foundations to explain various phenomena. The contribution of qualitative researchers to theory development and advancement remains significant and highly valued, especially in an era of various epochal shifts and technological innovation in the form of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Even so, the academic community has not yet fully explored the dynamics of AI in research and there are significant gaps in our understanding of how AI can be used most effectively in the context of theory building. The aim of this paper, which is driven by critical and conceptualization methodological dynamics, is to investigate the role of AI in the theory development process. As such, it critically evaluates the opportunities and limitations of AI in theory building, delivers a conceptual map of the nexus between AI and theory development, and presents key considerations for the use of AI in the creation of new theories or the advancement of existing ones. Though the necessity of AI tools in theory creation is contested given that the researchers' cognitive and evaluative skills are regarded as critical in this process, the value of AI in advancing theory is not to be underestimated.
Keywords
artificial intelligence, AI, theory, theory building, qualitative research
Publication Date
9-18-2023
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6536
Recommended APA Citation
Christou, P. (2023). The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Qualitative Research for Theory Development. The Qualitative Report, 28(9), 2739-2755. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6536
ResearcherID
0000-0001-6628-2619
Included in
Arts and Humanities Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons