A Comparison of the Impact of Colonial Heritage on the Development of Former Western and Soviet Union Colonies

Researcher Information

Abstract

How successful were countries colonized by the West in developing compared to countries colonized by the Soviet Union. This paper presented three hypotheses: Former Soviet colonies will be more economically developed than former Western colonies, Former Soviet colonies will be more politically developed than former Western colonies, Former Soviet colonies will be more socially developed than former Western colonies. These hypotheses are derived from the theory that the types of colonialism that the Soviet Union and Western countries practiced were different, meaning that Western European nations created colonies to extract resources from them, rather than to form permanent bonds. This is in direct contrast to the Soviet Union who colonized other nations to become one large nation, focusing more on combining culture and power. At this end of this paper, it is shown that there is no statistical support for former Soviet colonies being more economically developed, but there is strong statistical support for them being more politically developed, and moderate statistical support for them being more socially developed. This implies that the idea of the West always being superior to the east might be an unfounded assumption and supports the theory that former Soviet colonies are more developed than former Western colonies due to the type of colonialism they practiced.

Faculty Sponsors

Dr. Ransford Edwards

Project Type

Event

Location

Alvin Sherman Library

Start Date

4-3-2024 12:30 PM

End Date

4-4-2024 1:30 PM

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 3rd, 12:30 PM Apr 4th, 1:30 PM

A Comparison of the Impact of Colonial Heritage on the Development of Former Western and Soviet Union Colonies

Alvin Sherman Library

How successful were countries colonized by the West in developing compared to countries colonized by the Soviet Union. This paper presented three hypotheses: Former Soviet colonies will be more economically developed than former Western colonies, Former Soviet colonies will be more politically developed than former Western colonies, Former Soviet colonies will be more socially developed than former Western colonies. These hypotheses are derived from the theory that the types of colonialism that the Soviet Union and Western countries practiced were different, meaning that Western European nations created colonies to extract resources from them, rather than to form permanent bonds. This is in direct contrast to the Soviet Union who colonized other nations to become one large nation, focusing more on combining culture and power. At this end of this paper, it is shown that there is no statistical support for former Soviet colonies being more economically developed, but there is strong statistical support for them being more politically developed, and moderate statistical support for them being more socially developed. This implies that the idea of the West always being superior to the east might be an unfounded assumption and supports the theory that former Soviet colonies are more developed than former Western colonies due to the type of colonialism they practiced.