An Impartial Supreme Court? Evaluating the Role of Public Opinion in Supreme Court Rulings

Researcher Information

Abstract

Susceptibility to public opinion is a phenomena faced by most political leaders, whether that be in City Halls or the United States’ Senate. Regardless, when separation of powers was conceptualized and the Supreme Court of the United States was created, the intent was to have a particular branch that didn’t make the law, but interpreted it, impartially, with a lack of partisanship opinion. In recent years, researchers have noticed a pattern of Supreme Court rulings aligning perfectly with public opinion, making field experts and citizens alike, question the integrity of the institution. The current study seeks to better understand the extent to which public opinion is reflected in Supreme Court rulings by examining some of the most controversial cases that have come before the courts. The implications of this research dictate the level of restructuring that needs to occur in the Supreme Court, and, more importantly, if the Supreme Court can be trusted as highly with ruling on cases that change millions of Americans. The integrity of the Supreme Court determines accessibility to constitutionally guaranteed rights.

Faculty Sponsors

Dr. Ransford Edwards

Project Type

Event

Location

Alvin Sherman Library

Start Date

4-5-2023 12:00 PM

End Date

4-6-2023 4:00 PM

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 5th, 12:00 PM Apr 6th, 4:00 PM

An Impartial Supreme Court? Evaluating the Role of Public Opinion in Supreme Court Rulings

Alvin Sherman Library

Susceptibility to public opinion is a phenomena faced by most political leaders, whether that be in City Halls or the United States’ Senate. Regardless, when separation of powers was conceptualized and the Supreme Court of the United States was created, the intent was to have a particular branch that didn’t make the law, but interpreted it, impartially, with a lack of partisanship opinion. In recent years, researchers have noticed a pattern of Supreme Court rulings aligning perfectly with public opinion, making field experts and citizens alike, question the integrity of the institution. The current study seeks to better understand the extent to which public opinion is reflected in Supreme Court rulings by examining some of the most controversial cases that have come before the courts. The implications of this research dictate the level of restructuring that needs to occur in the Supreme Court, and, more importantly, if the Supreme Court can be trusted as highly with ruling on cases that change millions of Americans. The integrity of the Supreme Court determines accessibility to constitutionally guaranteed rights.