A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Possible Alternatives for the Chemical Triclosan.

Researcher Information

Besty Jacob

Project Type

Event

Start Date

4-4-2008 12:00 AM

End Date

4-4-2008 12:00 AM

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 4th, 12:00 AM Apr 4th, 12:00 AM

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Possible Alternatives for the Chemical Triclosan.

The chemical Triclosan is currently being used in a variety of household products. Soap, shampoo, dishwashing solution, detergents, cosmetics and lotions all utilize this product. These and other similar products market Triclosan as a bactericide. However Triclosan may not be as effective at killing bacteria when combined with these commercial products as advertised. There may potentially be safer and more effective alternatives. A potential problem with the overuse of Triclosan, is current and potential bacterial resistance. For instance, some strains of MRSA (Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Auereus) have already developed resistance to this chemical. On the other hand, there are circumstances where Triclosan may be beneficial and its use is not questioned. In hospital settings Triclosan is useful for cleaning and disinfecting. However the widespread use of this product in a number of different household products is questionable without further review. This review will explore other possible alternatives to this product and will review the costs and benefits associated with such.