Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Proceedings, Presentations, Speeches, Lectures

Surface Quality Assessment of Explanted Keratoprostheses Using Confocal and Scanning Electron Microscopy

Event Name/Location

Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Annual Meeting / Powerful Connections: Vision Research and Online Networking / May 3-7, 2015 / Denver, CO

Presentation Date

6-2015

Document Type

Conference Proceeding

Proceeding Title

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science

ISSN

0146-0404

Description

Purpose To evaluate the effects of the irregular surfaces of Boston Type I keratoprostheses after explanation using confocal and scanning electron microscopy.


MethodsFailed Boston Type I Keratoprostheses (KPro) were collected from patients undergoing KPro explantation or exchange at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL, USA. In the operating room, the KPro samples were placed in a container with balanced salt solution immediately after removal. Fluorescent confocal microscopy was performed on the fresh, un-fixed KPro samples to visualize the microbial adherence and cellular growth. A live/dead green/red fluorescent stain was used along with a Leica 5PS confocal microscope. Images were taken across the entire anterior and posterior surfaces of the KPro samples to characterize the complete KPro surface. The optical surfaces of the KPro were imaged with bright field illumination of the confocal microscopy. After confocal microscopy, the KPro sample is fixed in 10% formalin, immersed in PBS buffer, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, dried in HMDS, and sputter-coated with Palladium for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Images of the anterior and posterior surfaces of the KPro were obtained using SEM at multiple magnifications (30x-5000x).

Results Confocal microscopy and SEM images showed rough surfaces on all regions of the keratoprostheses. The confocal microcopy revealed cellular growth in areas of more irregularities. The high magnification SEM images showed many bacteria and biofilm colonies attached to the KPros. In one case, the patient also had an intraocular lens (IOL) which was analyzed as was the KPro to relate surface features to microbial adherence. The IOL had super polished surfaces with almost no microbial adherence.

Conclusions Dual imaging approaches in this ongoing study enabled an accurate evaluation of the failed keratoprostheses, and thus better elucidated the mechanisms that lead to their explantation.

First Page

1125

Comments

Volume 56 Issue 7

Link to Full Text

Find in your library

Share

COinS