Abstract
This paper seeks to defend United States intervention in states that violate international human rights law. To explain the modem framework behind the legal justifications for intervention, it is necessary to review the historical development of international human rights law, the concept of sovereignty, and the continuing conflict between the two principles.
Recommended Citation
Meyers, Mitchell A.
(1997)
"A Defense Of Unilateral Or Multi-Lateral Intervention Where A Violation Of International Human Rights Law By A State Constitutes An Implied Waiver Of Sovereignty,"
ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law: Vol. 3:
Iss.
3, Article 6.
Available at:
https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ilsajournal/vol3/iss3/6
COinS