HCBE Faculty Articles
Rater leniency and performance appraisal discomfort.
ORCID
Randi L. Sims0000-0001-5671-1045
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Educational and Psychological Measurement
ISSN
0013-1644
Publication Date
1-1-1993
Abstract/Excerpt
This study investigated the predictability of rater leniency from scores on an instrument designed to measure rater discomfort with performance appraisal situations. The 20-item Performance Appraisal Discomfort Scale (PADS) was administered twice to a sample of 178 undergraduate business students who rated performance of group members on three group projects under conditions designed to emulate features of actual appraisal situations. Results supported the notion that rater leniency is stable and predictable from PADS scores. Also, principal-component extracted and varimax rotated factors of the PADS were interpreted as corresponding to four distinct situational demands placed on raters in the course of performance appraisal. The results of this limited demonstration of the validity of PADS suggest that future application of the PADS or some like instrument may be useful for enhancing the validity of appraisal ratings and feedback utility.
Volume
53
Issue
3
First Page
789
Last Page
799
NSUWorks Citation
Villanova, P.; Bernardin, H. J.; Dahmus, S. A.; and Sims, Randi L., "Rater leniency and performance appraisal discomfort." (1993). HCBE Faculty Articles. 148.
https://nsuworks.nova.edu/hcbe_facarticles/148