The Social Consequences of Absolute Moral Proclamations

Date Range

2019-11-15 to 2019-11-18

Event Location / Date(s)

/

Presentation Date

11-17-2019

Document Type

Paper

Presenter(s)/Author(s)

Elizabeth Huppert, The University of ChicagoFollow
Nicholas R. Herzog, University of ChicagoFollow
Justin F. Landy, Nova Southeastern UniversityFollow
Emma E. Levine, Nova Southeastern UniversityFollow

Description

Across six studies (N = 3348), we find that people prefer targets who make absolute proclamations (i.e. "It is never okay for people to lie" ) over targets who make ambiguous proclamations ("It is sometimes okay for people to lie" ), even when both targets tell equivalent lies. Preferences for absolutism stem from the belief that moral proclamations send a true signal about moral character--they are not cheap talk. Therefore, absolute proclamations signal moral character, despite also signaling hypocrisy. This research sheds light on the consequences of absolute proclamations and identifies circumstances in which hypocrisy is preferred over consistency.

NSUWorks Citation

Huppert, E., Herzog, N. R., Landy, J. F., Levine, E. E. (2019). The Social Consequences of Absolute Moral Proclamations. .
Available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cps_facpresentations/4637