Controversy clarified: an updated review of clinical psychology and tele-health
Clinical Psychology Review
One of the most controversial topics in the field of clinical psychology, online tele-health, or the integration of computers and the internet with therapeutic techniques, remains at the forefront of many debates. Despite potential interest, there are numerous factors that a psychologist must consider before integrating an online tele-health intervention into their own practice. This article outlines literature pertinent to the debate. The article begins with a brief history of the use of non-face-to-face interventions as well as the earliest recorded use of "tele-health" before discussing the modern benefits and risks associated with usage. Considerations for the psychologist as well as the client are detailed; incorporating ethical implications. The authors conclude that the utilization of tele-health interventions is an exponentially expanding field that should continue to be explored. Despite many well-conceived studies, a psychologist should educate themselves in all aspects of the new modes of intervention (e.g., ethical, legal, evidence-based treatments) before attempting to implement them into everyday practice. The article ends with a discussion on the acceptance among psychologists, as well as the outlook for the future.
Perle, J. G.,
Langsam, L. C.,
Nierenberg, B. P.
(2011). Controversy clarified: an updated review of clinical psychology and tele-health. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(8), 1247-1258.
Available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cps_facarticles/277