Current Trends in Food Allergy–Induced Anaphylaxis Management at School

Author(s)

Matthew Greenhawt, University of Colorado School of Medicine
Dana Wallace, Nova Southeastern University
J. Wesley Sublett, Family Allergy and Asthma, Louisville, Kentucky
Erin Maughan, National Association of School Nurses
Andrea Tanner, National Association of School Nurses
Kevin J. Kelley, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Stanley Fineman, Emory University School of Medicine
Martha White, Institute for Asthma and Allergy
Ralph E. Cash, Nova Southeastern UniversityFollow
Charmayne Anderson, Allergy & Asthma Network
Sally Schoessler, Allergy & Asthma Network
Ruchi Gupta, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine
Michael Pistiner, Harvard University School of Medicine

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2018

Publication Title

Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology

Volume

121

Issue/Number

2

First Page

174

ISSN

1534-4436

Last Page

178

Abstract/Excerpt

Objective

To review the evidence and current policies regarding the use of epinephrine at schools and child care centers.

Data Sources and Study Selection

A narrative review was performed based on the result of conference proceedings of a group of interprofessional stakeholders who attended the USAnaphylaxis Summit 2017 presented by Allergy & Asthma Network.

Results

Anaphylaxis is a well-recognized medical emergency that requires prompt treatment with intramuscular epinephrine. Anaphylaxis can be associated with poor quality of life. There is renewed recent focus on anaphylaxis management in schools. This interest has been spurred by an increase in the number of children with food allergy who are attending school, data that support up to 25% of first-time anaphylactic events occurring on school grounds, and a well-publicized fatality that helped to initiate a movement for stock, undesignated, non–student-specific epinephrine. Stock epinephrine is now available in 49 states, with an increasing number of states instituting mandatory reporting for use of such devices. Nursing efforts are paramount to support and implement stock epinephrine programs. Many states do not have clarity on delegation of authority for who can administer stock epinephrine, and there is evidence of variability in storage of stock devices. Few states have outcomes data that support successful implementation of stock epinephrine programs.

Conclusions

Additional data are needed to demonstrate successful implementations of stock epinephrine programs and their outcomes. Such programs should include support for school nursing and clearer delineation of authority for medication administration as well as standards for where and how devices are stored.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2018.04.015

NSUWorks Citation

Greenhawt, M., Wallace, D., Sublett, J. W., Maughan, E., Tanner, A., Kelley, K. J., Fineman, S., White, M., Cash, R. E., Anderson, C., Schoessler, S., Gupta, R., Pistiner, M. (2018). Current Trends in Food Allergy–Induced Anaphylaxis Management at School. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 121(2), 174-178.
Available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cps_facarticles/1585