Chemistry and Physics Faculty Articles
Concierge Care and Patient Reviews
ORCID
0000-0001-8861-0898, 0000-0003-4692-9539
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Health Economics
ISSN
1057-9230
Publication Date
6-8-2020
Keywords
Concierge medicine, Interpersonal skills, Machine learning, Patient reviews, Sentiment analysis
Abstract
We examine how patient numerical ratings and specific words in written reviews of family physicians and internists in the states of California and Florida differ based upon concierge doctor status. Data are drawn from Healthgrades.com, one of the largest providers of online reviews, and a machine‐learning sentiment analysis is used to determine the predictors of concierge status and numerical patient ratings. We find that reviews of concierge doctors are more likely to contain technical words associated with health care, such as “staff” and “office,” compared with traditional physicians. In contrast, interpersonal bedside‐manner words, like “listen” or “concerns,” are most likely in reviews for nonconcierge doctors. We further determine that, whereas interpersonal words exhibit both positive and negative effects on numerical ratings, technical terms seem to primarily correlate negatively with patient scores for all doctors. The present work represents a first step towards understanding the measures of quality of care that relate with the patient experience, and in particular with respect to the growing field of concierge medicine. It is also the first attempt we are aware of that employs sentiment analysis in this context.
DOI
10.1002/hec.4028
First Page
1
Last Page
10
NSUWorks Citation
Nemzer, L. R., & Neymotin, F. (2020). Concierge Care and Patient Reviews. Health Economics, 1 - 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4028. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cnso_chemphys_facarticles/274
Comments
©2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.