Biology Faculty Articles
Mammalian captive dietary specialists like folivores are prone to gastrointestinal distress and primate dietary specialists suffer the greatest gut microbiome diversity losses in captivity compared to the wild. Marmosets represent another group of dietary specialists, exudivores that eat plant exudates, but whose microbiome remains relatively less studied. The common occurrence of gastrointestinal distress in captive marmosets prompted us to study the Callithrix gut microbiome composition and predictive function through bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA V4 region sequencing. We sampled 59 wild and captive Callithrix across four species and their hybrids. Host environment had a stronger effect on the gut microbiome than host taxon. Wild Callithrix gut microbiomes were enriched for Bifidobacterium, which process host-indigestible carbohydrates. Captive marmoset guts were enriched for Enterobacteriaceae, a family containing pathogenic bacteria. While gut microbiome function was similar across marmosets, Enterobacteriaceae seem to carry out most functional activities in captive host guts. More diverse bacterial taxa seem to perform gut functions in wild marmosets, with Bifidobacterium being important for carbohydrate metabolism. Captive marmosets showed gut microbiome composition aspects seen in human gastrointestinal diseases. Thus, captivity may perturb the exudivore gut microbiome, which raises implications for captive exudivore welfare and calls for husbandry modifications.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Malukiewicz, Joanna; Reed Cartwright; Jorge A. Dergam; Claudia S. Igayara; Sharon E. Kessler; Silvia B. Moreira; Leanne T. Nash; Patricia A. Nicola; Luiz C. M. Pereira; Alcides Pissinatti; Carlos R. Ruiz-Miranda; Andrew T. Ozga; Adriana A. Quirino; Christian Roos; Daniel L. Silva; Anne C. Stone; and Adriana D. Grativol. 2022. "The gut microbiome of exudivorous marmosets in the wild and captivity." Scientific Reports 12, (5049). doi:10.1038/s41598-022-08797-7.
Supplementary Table 2.xlsx (9 kB)
Supplementary Table 3.xlsx (7 kB)
Supplementary Table 4.xlsx (58 kB)
Supplementary Table 5.xlsx (7 kB)
Supplementary Legends.docx (14 kB)
Supplementary Figure 1.pdf (113 kB)
Supplementary Figure 2.pdf (335 kB)
Supplementary Figure 3.pdf (1916 kB)
Supplementary Figure 4.pdf (6870 kB)