Article Title
Closing The Gaps In United States Law And Implementing The rome Statute: A Comparative Approach
Abstract
This paper provides a comparative framework to analyze the extent to which five major democracies Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and France-incorporated the subject matter jurisdiction Articles of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ("Rome Statute") through their domestic legislative processes while ratifying the Rome Statute, and what, if anything, the United States can interpret from the five distinct approaches.
Recommended Citation
Hatchell, Michael P.
(2005)
"Closing The Gaps In United States Law And Implementing The rome Statute: A Comparative Approach,"
ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law: Vol. 12:
Iss.
1, Article 7.
Available at:
https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ilsajournal/vol12/iss1/7