Is Self-Monitoring of Alcohol Consumption Reactive?

Author(s)

Mark B. Sobell, Nova Southeastern UniversityFollow
Joanne BogardisFollow
Reinhard Schuller
Gloria I. Leo
Linda C. Sobell, Nova Southeastern UniversityFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Behavioral Assessment

ISSN

0191-5401

Publication Date

1989

Abstract

Investigated the reactivity of self-monitoring (SM) of alcohol consumption in normal drinking undergraduates assigned to either an SM (n = 40) or Recall only (n  = 29) procedure. Ss completed a retrospective timeline (TL) recall report of their drinking on 2 occasions. A between-groups analysis of TL data found no significant effects, suggesting that SM was not reactive. For the SM period, significantly more drinking was reported by Ss using the SM method. Data collected by the 2 methods differed in terms of reported frequency but not quantity of drinking, suggesting that some Ss forgot some drinking occasions when recalling their drinking by TL. While both methods provide comparable estimates of amount of alcohol consumed per drinking occasion, SM provides a more valid measure when either frequency or total amount consumed is important.

Volume

11

Issue

4

First Page

447

Last Page

458

NSUWorks Citation

Sobell, M. B., Bogardis, J., Schuller, R., Leo, G. I., Sobell, L. C. (1989). Is Self-Monitoring of Alcohol Consumption Reactive?. Behavioral Assessment, 11(4), 447-458.
Available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cps_facarticles/804