Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Articles

Spatiotemporal Variability in a Sandflat Elasmobranch Fauna in Shark Bay, Australia

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

11-2009

Publication Title

Marine Biology

ISSN

0025-3162

Volume

156

Issue/No.

12

First Page

2579

Last Page

2590

Abstract

Dramatic declines in populations of large elasmobranchs, as well as the potential release of elasmobranch mesopredators, have led to interest in the ecological role of this group of fishes. The first step to elucidating their ecological importance, however, is an understanding of elasmobranch community structure. Such studies are relatively uncommon, especially in communities where human impacts are thought to be low. We used visual surveys and a variety of capture methods to determine spatial and temporal variation in the species composition of a sandflat elasmobranch community in the relatively pristine ecosystem of Shark Bay, Australia. Overall, juvenile batoids dominated the community. Eleven elasmobranch species (10 batoids, 1 shark) were found to inhabit the sandflats during the cold season (June–August) and 21 species (12 batoids, 9 sharks) were recorded during the warm season. The overall density of elasmobranchs occupying the sandflat was also higher during the warm season. Nearshore areas, especially during the warm season, supported the highest densities of elasmobranchs overall as well as the dominant species (giant shovelnose ray, Glaucostegus typus, and reticulate whipray, Himantura uarnak). Such high elasmobranch abundance may be driven by a combination of factors including prey availability, predator avoidance, and behavioral thermoregulation. The high species richness and density of elasmobranchs in such a restricted area suggest that elasmobranch mesopredators could exert strong top-down impacts in nearshore environments in the absence of human impacts, but raises questions of how resources are partitioned among apparently similar species in this system.

Comments

©Springer-Verlag 2009

Additional Comments

NSF grant #s: OCE0526065, OCE0745606

DOI

10.1007/s00227-009-1282-2

This document is currently not available here.

Peer Reviewed

Find in your library

Share

COinS