Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Articles

An Update of the Visual_HEA Software to Improve the Implementation of the Habitat Equivalency Analysis Method

Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Ecological Engineering

ISSN

0925-8574

Publication Date

8-2017

Keywords

Biophysical method, Ecological equivalency, Compensatory mitigation, Environmental liability

Abstract

The Visual_HEA software tool was created in 2006 to facilitate the assessment of losses and gains in ecosystem services related to compensatory mitigation under the United States National Resource Damage Assessment Act (NRDA). Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA) is an ecological equivalence assessment method under NRDA that can be performed using the Visual_HEA software and for which it was named. The newers version – 2.6 – was recently enhanced and tested over several years to be adapted to the European context and to facilitate adherence to the Environmental Liability Directive (2004/35/EC) to compensate for environmental damages. Herein, enhancements, limitations, and a turnkey method of calculating variable gain and loss rates over space and time using the 2.6 version of the software are discussed. Major functionality enhancements include a quarterly discount calculation, increased decimal precision, gain calculations that extend into perpetuity, and the elimination of many small software “bugs”. A case study about the accidental pollution of the Mimizan River from a sodium hypochlorite spill at a paper mill illustrates the new functionalities of the software. The use of the HEA method to assess ecosystem services related to biodiversity offset has been widespread thanks to the development of this user-friendly software package. Furthermore, the HEA method implemented in Visual HEA_2.6 is recommended by the European Commission to enforce its Environmental Liability Directive and to size mitigations after accidental environmental damages.

DOI

10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.05.008

Volume

105

First Page

276

Last Page

283

Comments

©2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

This document is currently not available here.

Peer Reviewed

Find in your library

Share

COinS