Abstract
In the field of biomedical ethics, genetic enhancement—the alteration of human DNA to increase characteristics beyond normal function—is a highly contested topic. Genetic enhancement presents serious ethical issues, especially when gene therapy seeks to treat or prevent disease. This paper makes the consequentialist case that genetic enhancement, whether somatic or germline, is intrinsically unethical because of its ethical, societal, and systemic ramifications. The autonomy of future persons is violated by germline enhancement, which also runs the risk of deepening socioeconomic gaps and escalating intergenerational inequity. Even though it only affects the individual, somatic augmentation undermines human diversity and agency by promoting social stratification and devaluing effort and achievement. Responsibility demands that we consider the broader consequences of such technologies, ensuring that scientific advancements align with ethical principles. Unlike gene therapy, which restores health, enhancement contradicts medicine’s purpose and jeopardizes equitable and just practices in society.
Recommended Citation
Sajnani, Kiran S.
(2026)
"The Consequences of Attempted Human Perfection: Genetic Enhancement and Why It Is Immoral,"
Mako: NSU Undergraduate Student Journal: Vol. 2026, Article 1.
Available at:
https://nsuworks.nova.edu/mako/vol2026/iss1/1