Document Type

Thesis - NSU Access Only

Title

Characteristics and Tools Used by Physical Therapists for the Assessment of Pressure Ulcers

Authors

Cara Chickanosky, Nova Southeastern University

Degree Name

Master of Physical Therapy (MPT)

Copyright Statement

All rights reserved. This publication is intended for use solely by faculty, students, and staff of Nova Southeastern University. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, now known or later developed, including but not limited to photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the author or the publisher.

Department

College of Health Care Sciences - Physical Therapy Department

Publication Date / Copyright Date

1998

Publisher

Nova Southeastern University

NSUWorks Citation

Cara Chickanosky. 1998. Characteristics and Tools Used by Physical Therapists for the Assessment of Pressure Ulcers. Master's thesis. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, College of Health Care Sciences - Physical Therapy Department. (101)
https://nsuworks.nova.edu/hpd_pt_stuetd/101.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to 1) identify the involvement of physical therapists in assessing pressure ulcers, 2) determine what characteristics were considered important for assessment, 3) what methods/tools are used by physical therapists to assess pressure ulcers and 4) upon what criteria they selected.

Subjects: A random sample of 300 physical therapists who are members of the geriatric section of the American Physical Therapy Association were surveyed.

Methodology: A self-designed survey was used to gather information regarding pressure ulcer assessment. Data were analyzed through the use of frequency tabulations and percentages.

Results: Seventy of 136 participants reported involvement in pressure ulcer assessment. At least half of the 70 involved in wound care believed the characteristics of depth, circulation, granulation, undermining, size, amount of necrosis, nutrition and odor were very important for pressure ulcer assessment. The primary reasons given for utilization of these methods were: easy to use, inexpensive and non-invasive.

Conclusion: Currently physical therapists report use of tools which have been modified for improvement. The most frequently used methods lack data for reliability and validity and have been determined not to be effective in monitoring healing. While further research is needed on many proposed tools, education and awareness regarding the use of these tools is needed among physical therapists.

Disciplines

Physical Therapy