Voir Dire Examination: Minority Defendants Are Not Always Entitled to Have Specific Questions Asked of Potential Jurors Regarding Possible Racial Prejudice: Ristaino v. Ross

Authors

Abstract

Defendant Ross was convicted of armed robbery, assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon, and assault and battery with intent to commit murder.

Recommended Citation

(1977) "Voir Dire Examination: Minority Defendants Are Not Always Entitled to Have Specific Questions Asked of Potential Jurors Regarding Possible Racial Prejudice: Ristaino v. Ross," Nova Law Review: Vol. 1: Iss. 1, Article 11.
Available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nlr/vol1/iss1/11