Interdisciplinarity in Methods: Learning Qualitative Research in the Humanities

Location

1048

Format Type

Event

Format Type

Paper

Start Date

January 2019

End Date

January 2019

Abstract

Learning qualitative research methods in the humanities, specifically Women and Gender Studies, posed a challenge. I received good training on the theoretical aspects of qualitative research but really struggled with the application. After four qualitative methods courses taken across disciplines including women’s studies, sociology, and psychology, I finally felt prepared to care for the data I would soon collect from my participants. For this study, I focused on the question: for a discipline that claims trans/interdisciplinarity in all aspects of scholarship, is women’s studies interdisciplinary in methods? To answer this question, I chose to analyze five years of scholarship published in three of the top women's and gender studies journals (Feminist Formations, Signs, and Frontiers) to compare variations in methods within these published works. This inquiry is meant to start a conversation about applied feminism and how well women’s studies as a discipline varies in method as much as it does in theory.

Keywords

women's and gender studies, interdisciplinary, qualitative methods

Comments

Breakout Session C

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Jan 16th, 4:00 PM Jan 16th, 4:20 PM

Interdisciplinarity in Methods: Learning Qualitative Research in the Humanities

1048

Learning qualitative research methods in the humanities, specifically Women and Gender Studies, posed a challenge. I received good training on the theoretical aspects of qualitative research but really struggled with the application. After four qualitative methods courses taken across disciplines including women’s studies, sociology, and psychology, I finally felt prepared to care for the data I would soon collect from my participants. For this study, I focused on the question: for a discipline that claims trans/interdisciplinarity in all aspects of scholarship, is women’s studies interdisciplinary in methods? To answer this question, I chose to analyze five years of scholarship published in three of the top women's and gender studies journals (Feminist Formations, Signs, and Frontiers) to compare variations in methods within these published works. This inquiry is meant to start a conversation about applied feminism and how well women’s studies as a discipline varies in method as much as it does in theory.